Welcome, Register :: Log In		Welcome to our newest member, Agent67.
Users active in this forum:
Users active in this thread:

people online in the last 1 minutes - 0 members, 0 anon and 0 guests. (Most ever was 29 at 13:36:32 Sat Aug 3 2002)

Pages: [ 1 ]

[ Notify of replies made to this post ]

[ Print ]

[ Send To Friend ]

[ Watch ]

[ < ] [ Add Reply ] [ > ]

eightymesh 20:32:51 Fri Oct 30 2009 Offline 222 posts Reply

EPA bans dust Interact Reply Quote Report To Mod Last Posts Ignore User Global Ignore Whisper yup ol zerobamao's new regs is ten times tougher than before only allowing 2.5 micrograms per cubic meter of dust pollution. walking on dirt exceeds this limit, cattle raise more grazing and forget about driving down a dirt road..... have we had enough yet grrrrrrr http://www.epa.gov/particles/actions.html

survivorjp 00:10:31 Sat Oct 31 2009 Offline 35 posts Mood Now: Reply

Re: EPA bans dust Interact Reply Quote Report To Mod Last Posts Ignore User Global Ignore Whisper Wonder what Obamanation will do about "Space Dust" several tons fall to earth each year, we bettter get the EPA on that right away, maybe even have a Dept. of Space Dust Czar!!

tabwyo 23:24:46 Sat Oct 31 2009 Offline 195 posts Reply

Re: EPA bans dust Interact Reply Quote Report To Mod Last Posts Ignore User Global Ignore Whisper In accordance with section 319 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA proposes to change the uniform air quality index used by States for daily air quality reporting to the general public by revising the sub-index for fine particles less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers (μm) in diameter (PM2.5). WHEN WILL THE ATTROCITIES END?!?!?!?!!?! Getting your undies in a bunch over a reporting standard doesn't seem very worthwhile to me.

jjedwab 09:40:11 Mon Nov 2 2009 Offline 226 posts Reply

Re: EPA bans dust Interact Reply Quote Report To Mod Last Posts Ignore User Global Ignore Whisper Here is yet another answer: Clean the Air, Heat the Planet? ...There is thus a strong motivation for treating air pollution control and climate change in common policy frameworks (5, 6). However, recent model studies (7–9) have shown that changes in pollutant and precursor emissions, atmospheric burden, and radiative forcing are not necessarily proportional. Furthermore, as Shindell et al. report on page 716 of this issue, current models do not capture many of the complex atmospheric processes involving aerosols and reactive trace gases (10). Science 30 October 2009: Vol. 326. no. 5953, pp. 672 - 673 Almut Arneth, Nadine Unger, Markku Kulmala, Meinrat O. Andreae http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/sci;326/5953/672

survivorjp 15:56:52 Mon Nov 2 2009 Offline 35 posts Mood Now: Reply

Re: EPA bans dust Interact Reply Quote Report To Mod Last Posts Ignore User Global Ignore Whisper IT"S The Sun!!!!!!!! 99.9%!!! 36,000 Scientist agree

baub 16:06:58 Mon Nov 2 2009 Offline 915 posts Reply

Re: EPA bans dust Interact Reply Quote Report To Mod Last Posts Ignore User Global Ignore Whisper Some thoughts: Almost all surface mining would exceed these limits. No mining, or "Special exemptions" as judged by the govmint would be needed at what cost . Less albedo with recent volcanic eruptions happening Cooler weather as a result. Let's take this further. More sun striking the earth results in more volcanic activity. Sorta like a big heat lamp. This causes more volcanic activity and more reflection of the suns heat from earth, then less volcanic activity. A stable model emerges.

Pages: [ 1 ]

[ Notify of replies made to this post ]

[ Print ]

[ Send To Friend ]

[ Watch ]

[ < ] [ Add Reply ] [ > ]

Total Members: 11956 Can start a new thread. (Everyone) Can't start a new poll. (Mods & Admins) Can add a reply. (Everyone) Can't edit your posts.(Everyone Registered)

Register :: Log In :: Administrators The time is now 19:33:42 Tue Jun 28 2022