|
triton 01:13:33 Thu Mar 30 2006 |
|
|
miltecarms 00:47:12 Sat Apr 1 2006 |
|
|
Sgt_Pepper 02:47:26 Sat Apr 1 2006 |
A spraygun or any compressor attachment will have a suitable valve for a vortex gun as activation time is not an issue. |
|
triton 03:14:32 Sat Apr 1 2006 |
|
|
Sgt_Pepper 05:23:43 Sat Apr 1 2006 |
trigger. In the blow-off type piston setup you don't need quick release of the gas, as the piston does this job. The design that you linked to is overly complicated, there are easier way of doing the same thing, like having the pressure act on the piston against a spring, which reveals a transfer port at the end of its travel, firing the BB. As the port opens, pressure reduces and the spring pushes the piston back. |
|
triton 17:01:30 Sat Apr 1 2006 |
|
|
Sgt_Pepper 03:09:11 Sun Apr 2 2006 |
try post it: ![]() I've built a similar gun, but the gas flows through the piston and it uses 800+ psi. This design should get the most reliable feeding, no double shots. |
|
triton 07:03:19 Sun Apr 2 2006 |
i just decided on what i am going to base the design off of! the Calico light weapons systems M100! http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg57-e.htm |
|
uk_matt 22:19:18 Sun Jun 25 2006 |
i dont want to break the uk gun laws but want to do a home build gun. id realy like it to be semi and pellet fed . this seems like such a simple but effective method to me , which leaves alot more time to magazine building etc. thank you for shearing it with us . all the best matt |
|
Sgt_Pepper 01:24:19 Thu Jun 29 2006 |
spring the piston will stay forward after a shot and gas will escape until the trigger is released - only then the bolt will go back and another BB (or pellet) will drop down. |
|
Schrapnel_Life 18:35:47 Wed Jan 23 2008 |
The over-all concept is good, the only weakness is the usual, the ammo-magazine feed to pneumatic-chamber, unless it's a hose-pipe. Is hose-pipe really so wrong? Especially if it's in .22 cal.? |
|
SONYtec 12:39:41 Thu May 6 2010 |
|