New 49er     


The New 49'ers :: Members Forum :: Answer to Petition for review
Lost Password :: Posting Pictures :: Who's Online :: Stats :: Memberlist :: Top Posters :: Search



Make a donation to our message forums through Paypal


Make a donation to our Legal Fund.

 

Photobucket

Welcome, Register :: Log In Welcome to our newest member, Back_woods.

1 people online in the last 1 minutes - 0 members, 0 anon and 1 guests. (Most ever was 55 at 21:51:42 Sun Nov 11 2012)

Pages: [ 1 ]

[ Notify ][ Print ][ Send To Friend ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ > ]

Dave_Mack
Offline
679 posts
Administrator


Reply
Answer to Petition for review ( 07:48:05 FriDec 5 2014 )

Here is James Buchal's answer to the State's Petition for the California Supreme Court to review the recent Third Appellate Court's landmark Decision which confirms our right to mine on the public lands free from the unreasonable dictates of State government.

Keep in mind that this is not actually the review. This is an argument why the California Supreme should not do a review.

I believe this is the State's last hope of holding onto the power to impose unreasonable prohibitions and restrictions over the mining industry. They could Petition the U.S. Supreme Court, but that would likely be a waste of time.

I know this first step only concerns California. But the very same legal arguments will apply to other States where our industry is facing similar difficulties.

Keep your fingers crossed, you guys. A win here will reinforce our rights for many years to come! It would allow us to leave the industry positioned in better shape than what we inherited, in my own case, more than 35 years ago:

http://www.goldgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Answer-Petition-for-Review-2-5-14.pdf

  
Oakview2
Offline
75 posts
Reply
Re: Answer to Petition for review ( 13:56:25 FriDec 5 2014 )

HOMERUN:doublethumbsup:

  
Real49er
Offline
366 posts
Reply
Re: Answer to Petition for review ( 17:40:09 FriDec 5 2014 )

It reads exceedingly well to my untrained eye!

So let us all hope that it is read by the Calif. Supreme Court through the clear eyes of truth and justice, and not through the myopic vision of some agenda driven scheme!!!

  
Mark_Johnson
Offline
110 posts

Reply
Re: Answer to Petition for review ( 17:49:39 FriDec 5 2014 )

Fantastic work! Mr. Buchal once again demonstrates his absolute mastery of case law as it pertains to Mr. Rienharts case and our cause.

  

Pages: [ 1 ]

[ Notify ][ Print ][ Send To Friend ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ > ]

 Total Members: 4854

  • Can't start a new thread. (Everyone Registered)
  • Can't start a new poll. (Mods & Admins)
  • Can't add a reply. (Everyone Registered)
  • Can't edit your posts.(Everyone Registered)
  • Register :: Log In :: Administrators

    The time is 23:51:30 Wed Aug 16 2017

    Powered By BbBoard V1.4.2
    © 2001-2007 BbBoy.net
    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]