|Welcome, Register :: Log In||Welcome to our newest member, Agent67.|
|Users active in this forum:|
|Users active in this thread:|
people online in the last 1 minutes - 0 members, 0 anon and 0 guests. (Most ever was 29 at 13:36:32 Sat Aug 3 2002)|
|Muley||Re: DEMURRER DENIED OREGON vs WATERS|
Be carful there Cowboy,
One must remember one basic fact and that is that the judicial system is PART of the Political system.
Just look at how mucked up California is :mad:
or in other words, Don't count your nuggets, before you do your clean up.
Godspeed to ya,
|cowboy444||Re: DEMURRER DENIED OREGON vs WATERS|
I realize that geowizard.
I'm trying to show them how stupid they are and I expect them to bail before getting to court and really mucking it up.
|geowizard||Re: DEMURRER DENIED OREGON vs WATERS|
"Mr. Spicer also showed me his next tactic for getting me enonerated of the charge of not having the NPDES 700PM permit. It's listed under 541 us 105 and 106 which basicly states that there is no pollution without something from the outside of the river system being introduced into the river system."
Believe it or not... The prosecution reads this forum.
Personally, I wouldn't broadcast my next tactic. :confused:
|cowboy444|| DEMURRER DENIED OREGON vs WATERS|
I appeared in court this morning(10-31-12) and waited for over an hour for 2 others cases to be taken care of. My Lawyer let his assistant go as my Lawyer thought he had it in the bag. When the judge started to question him about the laws being used for the case and if they had been shepherded my Lawyer started to studder and didn't know(the assistant knew). The judge then rendered his decision that the demurrer was denied. Now I have a court date of March 14th and 15th 2013. I'll keep you all posted as any updates come into being.